Which is lighter, INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh or ROE Visual CB8 MkII?

Weight is close: 16 kg/m² for INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh against 15 kg/m² for ROE Visual CB8 MkII, so the rigging plot looks much the same either way.

Which draws more power?

ROE Visual CB8 MkII draws more: 736 W/m² against 500 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 20 kW versus 27.6 kW, and 8 versus 12 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.

Which resolves finer?

Both resolve to about the same density — 14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.

RigPlan

Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII

8.33 mm against 8.33 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh	ROE Visual CB8 MkII
Manufacturer	INFiLED	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	8.33 mm	8.33 mm
Cabinet	1000 × 1000 mm	600 × 1200 mm
Pixels per cabinet	120 × 120	72 × 144
Pixels per m²	14,400	14,400
Weight	15.5 kg (16 kg/m²)	11 kg (15 kg/m²)
Max power	500 W (500 W/m²)	530 W (736 W/m²)
Typical power	166 W	260 W
Max hang	not published	12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh	ROE Visual CB8 MkII
Wall built	8 × 5 — 8.00 × 5.00 m	13 × 4 — 7.80 × 4.80 m
Panels needed	40 + 2 spare	52 + 3 spare
Resolution	960 × 600 px	936 × 576 px
Weight incl. bumpers	720 kg	737 kg
Load per point	~288 kg across 3	~295 kg across 3
Power, full white	20 kW	27.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	8	12
Data runs	2 at ≤36/port	2 at ≤50/port
Truck, linear	2.5 m	3.1 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 5.00 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density — 14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Weight is close: 16 kg/m² for INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh against 15 kg/m² for ROE Visual CB8 MkII, so the rigging plot looks much the same either way.
ROE Visual CB8 MkII draws more: 736 W/m² against 500 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 20 kW versus 27.6 kW, and 8 versus 12 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Both come out at 2 data runs for this wall, though they carry 36 and 50 panels per port respectively.
Different cabinet formats: 1000 × 1000 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 40 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 2.5 m for INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh against 3.1 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons