ROE Visual CB8 MkII vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)

8.33 mm against 8.33 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	ROE Visual CB8 MkII	Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)
Manufacturer	ROE Visual	Unilumin
Pixel pitch	8.33 mm	8.33 mm
Cabinet	600 × 1200 mm	1200 × 1200 mm
Brightness	6,000 nits	6,500 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	not published
Viewing angle	140° / 110°	140° / 120°
Pixels per cabinet	72 × 144	144 × 144
Pixels per m²	14,400	14,400
Weight	11 kg (15 kg/m²)	71.1 kg (49 kg/m²)
Max power	530 W (736 W/m²)	936 W (650 W/m²)
Typical power	260 W	312 W
Max hang	12 panels	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	ROE Visual CB8 MkII	Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)
Wall built	13 × 4, 7.80 × 4.80 m	8 × 5, 9.60 × 6.00 m
Panels needed	52 + 3 spare	40 + 2 spare
Resolution	936 × 576 px	1,152 × 720 px
Weight incl. bumpers	612 kg	2,944 kg
Load per point	~245 kg across 3	~883 kg across 4
Power, full white	27.6 kW	37.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	12	15
Data runs	2 at ≤50/port	2 at ≤25/port
Truck, linear	3.1 m	5.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.80 m and 9.60 × 6.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
ROE Visual CB8 MkII is the lighter rig: 15 kg/m² against 49 kg/m². Across this wall that is 2,332 kg of difference, 612 kg versus 2,944 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual CB8 MkII draws more: 736 W/m² against 650 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 27.6 kW versus 37.4 kW, and 12 versus 15 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Both come out at 2 data runs for this wall, though they carry 50 and 25 panels per port respectively.
Different cabinet formats: 600 × 1200 mm against 1200 × 1200 mm, so 52 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 3.1 m for ROE Visual CB8 MkII against 5.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

ROE Visual CB8 MkII vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons