INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)

8.33 mm against 8.33 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 9.60 × 6.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh is the lighter rig: 16 kg/m² against 49 kg/m². Across this wall that is 2,224 kg of difference, 720 kg versus 2,944 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200) draws more: 650 W/m² against 500 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 20 kW versus 37.4 kW, and 8 versus 15 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 2 data runs for this wall, though they carry 36 and 25 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 1000 × 1000 mm against 1200 × 1200 mm, so 40 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 2.5 m for INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh against 5.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh: specs and calculator
• Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200): specs and calculator
• All INFiLED panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII
• Desay M8 vs INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh
• INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)
• INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)
• ROE Visual CB8 MkII vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)