Which is lighter, INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini or ROE Visual CB8 MkII?

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini is the lighter rig: 12 kg/m² against 15 kg/m². Across this wall that is 25 kg of difference — 712 kg versus 737 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.

Which draws more power?

ROE Visual CB8 MkII draws more: 736 W/m² against 458 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.8 kW versus 27.6 kW, and 9 versus 12 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.

Which resolves finer?

Both resolve to about the same density — 14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.

RigPlan

Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII

8.33 mm against 8.33 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini	ROE Visual CB8 MkII
Manufacturer	INFiLED	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	8.33 mm	8.33 mm
Cabinet	1200 × 600 mm	600 × 1200 mm
Pixels per cabinet	144 × 72	72 × 144
Pixels per m²	14,400	14,400
Weight	8.5 kg (12 kg/m²)	11 kg (15 kg/m²)
Max power	330 W (458 W/m²)	530 W (736 W/m²)
Typical power	110 W	260 W
Max hang	not published	12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini	ROE Visual CB8 MkII
Wall built	8 × 9 — 9.60 × 5.40 m	13 × 4 — 7.80 × 4.80 m
Panels needed	72 + 4 spare	52 + 3 spare
Resolution	1,152 × 648 px	936 × 576 px
Weight incl. bumpers	712 kg	737 kg
Load per point	~214 kg across 4	~295 kg across 3
Power, full white	23.8 kW	27.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	9	12
Data runs	2 at ≤50/port	2 at ≤50/port
Truck, linear	4 m	3.1 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 9.60 × 5.40 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density — 14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini is the lighter rig: 12 kg/m² against 15 kg/m². Across this wall that is 25 kg of difference — 712 kg versus 737 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual CB8 MkII draws more: 736 W/m² against 458 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.8 kW versus 27.6 kW, and 9 versus 12 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Both come out at 2 data runs for this wall, though they carry 50 and 50 panels per port respectively.
Different cabinet formats: 1200 × 600 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 72 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 3.1 m for ROE Visual CB8 MkII against 4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons