INFiLED AMmk2 ORAM8.3mk2 mini vs ROE Visual Carbon CB8 MkII

8.33 mm against 8.33 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 9.60 × 5.40 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• INFiLED AMmk2 ORAM8.3mk2 mini is the lighter rig: 12 kg/m² against 15 kg/m². Across this wall that is 100 kg of difference, 612 kg versus 712 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• ROE Visual Carbon CB8 MkII draws more: 736 W/m² against 458 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.8 kW versus 27.6 kW, and 9 versus 12 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 2 data runs for this wall, though they carry 50 and 50 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 1200 × 600 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 72 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 3.1 m for ROE Visual Carbon CB8 MkII against 4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• INFiLED AMmk2 ORAM8.3mk2 mini: specs and calculator
• ROE Visual Carbon CB8 MkII: specs and calculator
• All INFiLED panels
• All ROE Visual panels

Related comparisons

• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII
• INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII
• INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)
• Desay M8 vs INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini
• Desay M8 vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII
• ROE Visual CB8 MkII vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)