Desay M8 vs INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh

8.333 mm against 8.33 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh is the lighter rig: 16 kg/m² against 24 kg/m². Across this wall that is 265 kg of difference, 720 kg versus 985 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Desay M8 draws more: 540 W/m² against 500 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 19.5 kW versus 20 kW, and 10 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Desay M8: 1 runs against 2, at 50 and 36 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 800 × 900 mm against 1000 × 1000 mm, so 50 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 2.5 m for INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh against 2.9 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Desay M8: specs and calculator
• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh: specs and calculator
• All Desay panels
• All INFiLED panels

Related comparisons

• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII
• Desay M8 vs ROE Visual V8S
• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs ROE Visual V8S
• Desay M8 vs ROE Visual V8T
• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs ROE Visual V8T
• Absen JP8 Pro vs Desay M8