Desay M8 vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII

8.333 mm against 8.33 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (14,400 and 14,400 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• ROE Visual CB8 MkII is the lighter rig: 15 kg/m² against 24 kg/m². Across this wall that is 373 kg of difference, 612 kg versus 985 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• ROE Visual CB8 MkII draws more: 736 W/m² against 540 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 19.5 kW versus 27.6 kW, and 10 versus 12 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Desay M8: 1 runs against 2, at 50 and 50 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 800 × 900 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 50 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 2.9 m for Desay M8 against 3.1 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Desay M8: specs and calculator
• ROE Visual CB8 MkII: specs and calculator
• All Desay panels
• All ROE Visual panels

Related comparisons

• INFiLED ORAMT8.33 Mesh vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII
• INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII
• INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 mini vs ROE Visual CB8 MkII
• Desay M8 vs ROE Visual V8S
• Desay M8 vs ROE Visual V8T
• Absen JP8 Pro vs Desay M8