RigPlan.app

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2 vs Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)

8.33 mm against 8.33 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)
ManufacturerINFiLEDUnilumin
Pixel pitch8.33 mm8.33 mm
Cabinet1200 × 1200 mm1200 × 1200 mm
Brightness3,500 nits6,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hznot published
Viewing angle160° / 160°140° / 120°
Pixels per cabinet144 × 144144 × 144
Pixels per m²14,40014,400
Weight15.5 kg (11 kg/m²)71.1 kg (49 kg/m²)
Max power660 W (458 W/m²)936 W (650 W/m²)
Typical power220 W312 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

INFiLED ORAM8.3mk2Unilumin Usurface III 8.33 (1200×1200)
Wall built8 × 5, 9.60 × 6.00 m8 × 5, 9.60 × 6.00 m
Panels needed40 + 2 spare40 + 2 spare
Resolution1,152 × 720 px1,152 × 720 px
Weight incl. bumpers720 kg2,944 kg
Load per point~216 kg across 4~883 kg across 4
Power, full white26.4 kW37.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)1015
Data runs2 at ≤25/port2 at ≤25/port
Truck, linear3.3 m5.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 9.60 × 6.00 m and 9.60 × 6.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons