Planar TVF018 vs Sharp LD-FE193

1.89 mm against 1.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.86 × 4.42 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (279,947 and 277,008 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Planar TVF018 is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 583 kg of difference, 1,069 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Planar TVF018 draws more: 598 W/m² against 183 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 20.8 kW versus 6.4 kW, and 13 versus 3 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 26 data runs for this wall, though they carry 9 and 9 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 604.8 × 340.2 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Planar TVF018: specs and calculator
• Sharp LD-FE193: specs and calculator
• All Planar panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9
• Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9
• Planar CLI1.9-F vs Sharp LD-FE193
• Sharp LD-FE193 vs YES TECH MG10 P1.9
• Leyard CLI1.9 vs Sharp LD-FE193
• Barco X1.9 vs Sharp LD-FE193