Which is lighter, Barco X1.9 or Sharp LD-FE193?

Barco X1.9 is the lighter rig: 37 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 82 kg of difference — 1,570 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.

Which draws more power?

Barco X1.9 draws more: 917 W/m² against 183 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 33 kW versus 6.4 kW, and 20 versus 3 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.

Which resolves finer?

Both resolve to about the same density — 270,400 and 277,008 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.

RigPlan

Wall in. Truck list out.

Barco X1.9 vs Sharp LD-FE193

1.92 mm against 1.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Barco X1.9	Sharp LD-FE193
Manufacturer	Barco	Sharp
Pixel pitch	1.92 mm	1.9 mm
Cabinet	400 × 450 mm	608 × 342 mm
Pixels per cabinet	208 × 234	320 × 180
Pixels per m²	270,400	277,008
Weight	6.6 kg (37 kg/m²)	8.8 kg (42 kg/m²)
Max power	165 W (917 W/m²)	38 W (183 W/m²)
Typical power	55 W*	22 W
Max hang	not published	not published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3 — this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Barco X1.9	Sharp LD-FE193
Wall built	20 × 10 — 8.00 × 4.50 m	13 × 13 — 7.90 × 4.45 m
Panels needed	200 + 10 spare	169 + 9 spare
Resolution	4,160 × 2,340 px	4,160 × 2,340 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,570 kg	1,652 kg
Load per point	~628 kg across 3	~661 kg across 3
Power, full white	33 kW	6.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	20	3
Data runs	20 at ≤10/port	26 at ≤9/port
Truck, linear	8.3 m	7.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density — 270,400 and 277,008 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Barco X1.9 is the lighter rig: 37 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 82 kg of difference — 1,570 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Barco X1.9 draws more: 917 W/m² against 183 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 33 kW versus 6.4 kW, and 20 versus 3 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Barco X1.9: 20 runs against 26, at 10 and 9 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 400 × 450 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 200 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 7.3 m for Sharp LD-FE193 against 8.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Barco X1.9 vs Sharp LD-FE193

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons