Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9

1.9 mm against 1.905 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 7.90 × 4.45 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density — 277,008 and 275,267 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Unilumin UpanelS 1.9 is the lighter rig: 36 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 219 kg of difference — 1,433 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Unilumin UpanelS 1.9 draws more: 669 W/m² against 183 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 6.4 kW versus 23.7 kW, and 3 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 26 data runs for this wall, though they carry 9 and 9 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 608 × 342 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Sharp LD-FE193 — specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS 1.9 — specs and calculator
• All Sharp panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Planar CLI1.9-F vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9
• Unilumin UpanelS 1.9 vs YES TECH MG10 P1.9
• Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9
• Planar CLI1.9-F vs Sharp LD-FE193
• Sharp LD-FE193 vs YES TECH MG10 P1.9
• Barco X1.9 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9