Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9

1.9 mm against 1.906 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.90 × 4.45 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (277,008 and 275,267 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9 is the lighter rig: 32 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 338 kg of difference, 1,314 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9 draws more: 597 W/m² against 183 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 6.4 kW versus 21.1 kW, and 3 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 26 data runs for this wall, though they carry 9 and 9 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 608 × 342 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Sharp LD-FE193: specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9: specs and calculator
• All Sharp panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9
• Barco TP1.9-E vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9
• Planar CLI1.9-F vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9
• Planar CLI1.9-F vs Sharp LD-FE193
• Sharp LD-FE193 vs YES TECH MG10 P1.9
• Leyard CLI1.9 vs Sharp LD-FE193