Leyard CLI1.9 vs Sharp LD-FE193

1.9 mm against 1.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Sharp LD-FE193 resolves finer: 277,008 pixels per square metre against 262,144 for Leyard CLI1.9, 6% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 4,160 px across versus 4,096 px.
• Leyard CLI1.9 is the lighter rig: 16 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 862 kg of difference, 790 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Leyard CLI1.9 draws more: 1200 W/m² against 183 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 43.2 kW versus 6.4 kW, and 16 versus 3 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Sharp LD-FE193: 26 runs against 32, at 7 and 9 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 500 × 500 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 144 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 6.5 m for Leyard CLI1.9 against 7.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Leyard CLI1.9: specs and calculator
• Sharp LD-FE193: specs and calculator
• All Leyard panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9
• Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9
• Planar CLI1.9-F vs Sharp LD-FE193
• Sharp LD-FE193 vs YES TECH MG10 P1.9
• Leyard CLI1.9 vs Planar CLI1.9-F
• Leyard CLI1.9 vs YES TECH MG10 P1.9