RigPlan

PixelFLEX FLEXUltra XT 1.9 SMD vs Sharp LD-FE193

1.9 mm against 1.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

PixelFLEX FLEXUltra XT 1.9 SMDSharp LD-FE193
ManufacturerPixelFLEXSharp
Pixel pitch1.9 mm1.9 mm
Cabinet608 × 342 mm608 × 342 mm
Brightness900 nits700 nits
Refresh rate2,520 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°170° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet320 × 180320 × 180
Pixels per m²277,008277,008
Weight6.3 kg (30 kg/m²)8.8 kg (42 kg/m²)
Max power104 W (500 W/m²)38 W (183 W/m²)
Typical power35 W*22 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

PixelFLEX FLEXUltra XT 1.9 SMDSharp LD-FE193
Wall built13 × 13, 7.90 × 4.45 m13 × 13, 7.90 × 4.45 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution4,160 × 2,340 px4,160 × 2,340 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,230 kg1,652 kg
Load per point~492 kg across 3~661 kg across 3
Power, full white17.6 kW6.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)73
Data runs26 at ≤9/port26 at ≤9/port
Truck, linear7.3 m7.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.90 × 4.45 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons