Nanolumens Nixel 3 Rigid vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII

3.81 mm against 3.75 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Nanolumens Nixel 3 Rigid	ROE Visual CB3 MkII
Manufacturer	Nanolumens	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	3.81 mm	3.75 mm
Cabinet	304.8 × 152.4 mm	600 × 1200 mm
Brightness	980 nits	4,500 nits
Refresh rate	not published	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 140°	140° / 110°
Pixels per cabinet	80 × 40	160 × 320
Pixels per m²	68,889	71,111
Weight	1.17 kg (25 kg/m²)	14 kg (19 kg/m²)
Max power	22 W (474 W/m²)	600 W (833 W/m²)
Typical power	6.6 W	300 W
Max hang	not published	12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Nanolumens Nixel 3 Rigid	ROE Visual CB3 MkII
Wall built	25 × 28, 7.62 × 4.27 m	13 × 4, 7.80 × 4.80 m
Panels needed	700 + 35 spare	52 + 3 spare
Resolution	2,000 × 1,120 px	2,080 × 1,280 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,134 kg	768 kg
Load per point	~454 kg across 3	~307 kg across 3
Power, full white	15.4 kW	31.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	7	13
Data runs	5 at ≤162/port	7 at ≤10/port
Truck, linear	25.4 m	3.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.62 × 4.27 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

ROE Visual CB3 MkII resolves finer: 71,111 pixels per square metre against 68,889 for Nanolumens Nixel 3 Rigid, 3% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 2,080 px across versus 2,000 px.
ROE Visual CB3 MkII is the lighter rig: 19 kg/m² against 25 kg/m². Across this wall that is 366 kg of difference, 768 kg versus 1,134 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual CB3 MkII draws more: 833 W/m² against 474 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 15.4 kW versus 31.2 kW, and 7 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Nanolumens Nixel 3 Rigid: 5 runs against 7, at 162 and 10 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 304.8 × 152.4 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 700 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 3.3 m for ROE Visual CB3 MkII against 25.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Nanolumens Nixel 3 Rigid vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons