Nanolumens NXT 3.75 SMD vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII

3.75 mm against 3.75 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Nanolumens NXT 3.75 SMD	ROE Visual CB3 MkII
Manufacturer	Nanolumens	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	3.75 mm	3.75 mm
Cabinet	600 × 337.5 mm	600 × 1200 mm
Brightness	800 nits	4,500 nits
Refresh rate	not published	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	170° / 170°	140° / 110°
Pixels per cabinet	160 × 90	160 × 320
Pixels per m²	71,111	71,111
Weight	5.1 kg (25 kg/m²)	14 kg (19 kg/m²)
Max power	126 W (622 W/m²)	600 W (833 W/m²)
Typical power	42 W	300 W
Max hang	not published	12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Nanolumens NXT 3.75 SMD	ROE Visual CB3 MkII
Wall built	13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m	13 × 4, 7.80 × 4.80 m
Panels needed	169 + 9 spare	52 + 3 spare
Resolution	2,080 × 1,170 px	2,080 × 1,280 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,027 kg	768 kg
Load per point	~411 kg across 3	~307 kg across 3
Power, full white	21.3 kW	31.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	13	13
Data runs	7 at ≤36/port	7 at ≤10/port
Truck, linear	6.9 m	3.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (71,111 and 71,111 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
ROE Visual CB3 MkII is the lighter rig: 19 kg/m² against 25 kg/m². Across this wall that is 259 kg of difference, 768 kg versus 1,027 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual CB3 MkII draws more: 833 W/m² against 622 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 21.3 kW versus 31.2 kW, and 13 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Both come out at 7 data runs for this wall, though they carry 36 and 10 panels per port respectively.
Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 169 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 3.3 m for ROE Visual CB3 MkII against 6.9 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Nanolumens NXT 3.75 SMD vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons