LEDitgo sB3HB vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII

3.75 mm against 3.75 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	LEDitgo sB3HB	ROE Visual CB3 MkII
Manufacturer	LEDitgo	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	3.75 mm	3.75 mm
Cabinet	480 × 480 mm	600 × 1200 mm
Brightness	1,800 nits	4,500 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	170° / 170°	140° / 110°
Pixels per cabinet	128 × 128	160 × 320
Pixels per m²	71,111	71,111
Weight	8.7 kg (38 kg/m²)	14 kg (19 kg/m²)
Max power	160 W (694 W/m²)	600 W (833 W/m²)
Typical power	60 W	300 W
Max hang	not published	12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	LEDitgo sB3HB	ROE Visual CB3 MkII
Wall built	16 × 9, 7.68 × 4.32 m	13 × 4, 7.80 × 4.80 m
Panels needed	144 + 8 spare	52 + 3 spare
Resolution	2,048 × 1,152 px	2,080 × 1,280 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,453 kg	768 kg
Load per point	~581 kg across 3	~307 kg across 3
Power, full white	23 kW	31.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	8	13
Data runs	6 at ≤31/port	7 at ≤10/port
Truck, linear	5.8 m	3.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.68 × 4.32 m and 7.80 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (71,111 and 71,111 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
ROE Visual CB3 MkII is the lighter rig: 19 kg/m² against 38 kg/m². Across this wall that is 685 kg of difference, 768 kg versus 1,453 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual CB3 MkII draws more: 833 W/m² against 694 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23 kW versus 31.2 kW, and 8 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on LEDitgo sB3HB: 6 runs against 7, at 31 and 10 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 480 × 480 mm against 600 × 1200 mm, so 144 tiles versus 52 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 3.3 m for ROE Visual CB3 MkII against 5.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

LEDitgo sB3HB vs ROE Visual CB3 MkII

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons