AET vs Desay

34 matched panels · 1.25 to 3.906 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets

The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.

Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.

What the sheets say

• AET and Desay overlap on 34 matched pairs between 1.25 and 3.906 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
• AET is the lighter cabinet in 34 of 34 matched pairs, Desay in 0. Across their lineups that is 21 to 54 kg/m² against 22 to 44 kg/m².
• AET draws less at full white in 17 of 34 matched pairs, Desay in 9, and 8 are within 5%. Lineups: 400 to 680 W/m² against 531 to 760 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
• Cabinet formats: AET builds in 480×270, 600×337.5, 500×500, 480×540, 500×1000, 960×540 mm; Desay in 500×500, 800×900 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
• A hanging limit is published for none of its 45 panels by AET and for none of its 18 panels by Desay; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
• Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.

Matched panels, side by side

Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.

• AET KL12AC52 (1.25 mm) vs Desay X1.2i (1.25 mm)
• AET KL12AA53 (1.25 mm) vs Desay X1.2i (1.25 mm)
• AET NX QCOB 1.25 (1.25 mm) vs Desay X1.2i (1.25 mm)
• AET NX SMD 1.25 (1.25 mm) vs Desay X1.2i (1.25 mm)
• AET QC 2 (1.953 mm) vs Desay X1.9i (1.953 mm)
• AET QR 1.9 (1.953 mm) vs Desay X1.9i (1.953 mm)
• AET QR 1.9 (500×1000) (1.953 mm) vs Desay X1.9i (1.953 mm)
• AET QC 2.6 (2.604 mm) vs Desay X2.6i (2.604 mm)
• AET QR 2.6 (2.604 mm) vs Desay X2.6i (2.604 mm)
• AET QR 2.6 (500×1000) (2.604 mm) vs Desay X2.6i (2.604 mm)
• AET QC 2.976 (500×500) (2.976 mm) vs Desay X2.9i (2.976 mm)
• AET QC 2.976 (500×1000) (2.976 mm) vs Desay X2.9i (2.976 mm)
• AET QC 2.976 Outdoor (500×500) (2.976 mm) vs Desay X2.9i (2.976 mm)
• AET QC 2.976 Outdoor (500×1000) (2.976 mm) vs Desay X2.9i (2.976 mm)
• AET QR 2.9 (2.976 mm) vs Desay X2.9i (2.976 mm)
• AET QR 2.9 (500×1000) (2.976 mm) vs Desay X2.9i (2.976 mm)
• AET QR 2.9 Outdoor (2.976 mm) vs Desay X2.9i (2.976 mm)
• AET QR 2.9 Outdoor (500×1000) (2.976 mm) vs Desay X2.9i (2.976 mm)
• AET QC 3.9 (500×500) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9i (3.906 mm)
• AET QC 3.9 (500×500) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9 (3.906 mm)
• AET QC 3.9 (500×1000) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9i (3.906 mm)
• AET QC 3.9 (500×1000) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9 (3.906 mm)
• AET QC 3.91 Outdoor (500×500) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9i (3.906 mm)
• AET QC 3.91 Outdoor (500×500) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9 (3.906 mm)
• AET QC 3.91 Outdoor (500×1000) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9i (3.906 mm)
• AET QC 3.91 Outdoor (500×1000) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9 (3.906 mm)
• AET QR 3.9 (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9i (3.906 mm)
• AET QR 3.9 (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9 (3.906 mm)
• AET QR 3.9 (500×1000) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9i (3.906 mm)
• AET QR 3.9 (500×1000) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9 (3.906 mm)
• AET QR 3.9 Outdoor (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9i (3.906 mm)
• AET QR 3.9 Outdoor (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9 (3.906 mm)
• AET QR 3.9 Outdoor (500×1000) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9i (3.906 mm)
• AET QR 3.9 Outdoor (500×1000) (3.906 mm) vs Desay X3.9 (3.906 mm)

More

• All AET panels
• All Desay panels
• All makers compared