AET QR 2.6 (500×1000) vs Desay X2.6i

2.604 mm against 2.604 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (147,456 and 147,456 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• AET QR 2.6 (500×1000) is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 40 kg/m². Across this wall that is 400 kg of difference, 1,240 kg versus 1,640 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Desay X2.6i draws more: 660 W/m² against 580 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.2 kW versus 23.8 kW, and 8 versus 9 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 16 data runs for this wall, though they carry 7 and 14 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 500 × 1000 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 80 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• AET QR 2.6 (500×1000): specs and calculator
• Desay X2.6i: specs and calculator
• All AET panels
• All Desay panels

Related comparisons

• Desay X2.6i vs ROE Visual RB2.6F
• Desay X2.6i vs ROE Visual GP2.6
• Desay X2.6i vs SiliconCore Peony 2.6
• Desay X2.6i vs Digital Projection RCS-G 2.6 Large
• Desay X2.6i vs Digital Projection RCS-G 2.6 Medium
• Desay X2.6i vs Digital Projection RCS-C 2.6 Large