AET KL12AC52 vs Desay X1.2i

1.25 mm against 1.25 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	AET KL12AC52	Desay X1.2i
Manufacturer	AET	Desay
Pixel pitch	1.25 mm	1.25 mm
Cabinet	480 × 270 mm	500 × 500 mm
Brightness	700 nits	600 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	160° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet	384 × 432	400 × 400
Pixels per m²	1,280,000	640,000
Weight	3.4 kg (26 kg/m²)	10.9 kg (44 kg/m²)
Max power	58 W (448 W/m²)	188 W (752 W/m²)
Typical power	19 W	66 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	AET KL12AC52	Desay X1.2i
Wall built	17 × 17, 8.16 × 4.59 m	16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	289 + 15 spare	144 + 8 spare
Resolution	6,528 × 7,344 px	6,400 × 3,600 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,198 kg	1,770 kg
Load per point	~479 kg across 3	~708 kg across 3
Power, full white	16.8 kW	27.1 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	9	16
Data runs	102 at ≤3/port	48 at ≤3/port
Truck, linear	13.5 m	6.9 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.16 × 4.59 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

AET KL12AC52 resolves finer: 1,280,000 pixels per square metre against 640,000 for Desay X1.2i, 100% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 6,528 px across versus 6,400 px.
AET KL12AC52 is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 44 kg/m². Across this wall that is 572 kg of difference, 1,198 kg versus 1,770 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Desay X1.2i draws more: 752 W/m² against 448 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 16.8 kW versus 27.1 kW, and 9 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Desay X1.2i: 48 runs against 102, at 3 and 3 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 480 × 270 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 289 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 6.9 m for Desay X1.2i against 13.5 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

AET KL12AC52 vs Desay X1.2i

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons