Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.
| AET QC 2 | Desay X1.9i | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AET | Desay |
| Pixel pitch | 1.953 mm | 1.953 mm |
| Cabinet | 500 × 500 mm | 500 × 500 mm |
| Brightness | 800 nits | 800 nits |
| Refresh rate | 3,840 Hz | 2,880 Hz |
| Viewing angle | 140° / 140° | 160° / 140° |
| Pixels per cabinet | 256 × 256 | 256 × 256 |
| Pixels per m² | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Weight | 7 kg (28 kg/m²) | 10.9 kg (44 kg/m²) |
| Max power | 170 W (680 W/m²) | 190 W (760 W/m²) |
| Typical power | 58 W | 67 W |
| Max hang | not published | not published |
| AET QC 2 | Desay X1.9i | |
|---|---|---|
| Wall built | 16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m | 16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m |
| Panels needed | 144 + 8 spare | 144 + 8 spare |
| Resolution | 4,096 × 2,304 px | 4,096 × 2,304 px |
| Weight incl. bumpers | 1,208 kg | 1,770 kg |
| Load per point | ~483 kg across 3 | ~708 kg across 3 |
| Power, full white | 24.5 kW | 27.4 kW |
| Circuits (16 A/230 V) | 9 | 16 |
| Data runs | 32 at ≤7/port | 32 at ≤7/port |
| Truck, linear | 6.5 m | 6.5 m |
Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.
Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.
Open these two in the tool