AET QR 3.9 (500×1000) vs Desay X3.9

3.906 mm against 3.906 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (65,536 and 65,536 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• AET QR 3.9 (500×1000) is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 472 kg of difference, 1,240 kg versus 1,712 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Desay X3.9 draws more: 640 W/m² against 580 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.2 kW versus 23 kW, and 8 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 6 data runs for this wall, though they carry 15 and 31 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 500 × 1000 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 80 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• AET QR 3.9 (500×1000): specs and calculator
• Desay X3.9: specs and calculator
• All AET panels
• All Desay panels

Related comparisons

• Desay X3.9 vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9
• Desay X3.9 vs SiliconCore Tulip 3.9 Outdoor
• Desay X3.9 vs Digital Projection RCS-G 3.9 Large
• Desay X3.9 vs Digital Projection RCS-G 3.9 Medium
• Desay X3.9 vs Digital Projection RCS-C 3.9 Large
• Desay X3.9 vs Digital Projection RCS-C 3.9 Medium