RigPlan.app

Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP10 vs Nanolumens Performance 250 10.4

10.417 mm against 10.417 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP10Nanolumens Performance 250 10.4
ManufacturerBlizzard IRiSNanolumens
Pixel pitch10.417 mm10.417 mm
Cabinet1000 × 1000 mm250 × 250 mm
Brightness6,500 nits5,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hznot published
Viewing anglenot published140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet96 × 9624 × 24
Pixels per m²9,2169,216
Weight31 kg (31 kg/m²)2.33 kg (37 kg/m²)
Max power1000 W (1000 W/m²)41.3 W (661 W/m²)
Typical power333 W*12.4 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP10Nanolumens Performance 250 10.4
Wall built8 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m32 × 18, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed40 + 2 spare576 + 29 spare
Resolution768 × 480 px768 × 432 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,340 kg1,742 kg
Load per point~536 kg across 3~697 kg across 3
Power, full white40 kW23.8 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)2011
Data runs1 at ≤56/port1 at ≤902/port
Truck, linear5.4 m21.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons