RigPlan.app

Glux BAtn10 vs Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP10

10.4 mm against 10.417 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Glux BAtn10Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP10
ManufacturerGluxBlizzard IRiS
Pixel pitch10.4 mm10.417 mm
Cabinet1000 × 500 mm1000 × 1000 mm
Brightness5,000 nits6,500 nits
Refresh rate4,000 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°not published
Pixels per cabinet96 × 4896 × 96
Pixels per m²9,2169,216
Weight4.8 kg (10 kg/m²)31 kg (31 kg/m²)
Max power300 W (600 W/m²)1000 W (1000 W/m²)
Typical power150 W333 W*
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Glux BAtn10Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP10
Wall built8 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m8 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m
Panels needed72 + 4 spare40 + 2 spare
Resolution768 × 432 px768 × 480 px
Weight incl. bumpers446 kg1,340 kg
Load per point~178 kg across 3~536 kg across 3
Power, full white21.6 kW40 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)820
Data runs1 at ≤112/port1 at ≤56/port
Truck, linear3.3 m5.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons