Planar TVF011 vs Sharp LD-FE123

1.18 mm against 1.2 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.86 × 4.42 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Planar TVF011 resolves finer: 716,665 pixels per square metre against 623,269 for Sharp LD-FE123, 15% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 6,656 px across versus 6,240 px.
• Planar TVF011 is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 583 kg of difference, 1,069 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Planar TVF011 draws more: 598 W/m² against 183 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 20.8 kW versus 6.4 kW, and 13 versus 3 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Sharp LD-FE123: 52 runs against 65, at 3 and 4 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 604.8 × 340.2 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 8.1 m for Sharp LD-FE123 against 8.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Planar TVF011: specs and calculator
• Sharp LD-FE123: specs and calculator
• All Planar panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Barco XT1.2 vs Sharp LD-FE123
• Barco XT1.2-E vs Sharp LD-FE123
• PixelFLEX FLEXUltra XT 1.2 vs Sharp LD-FE123
• Planar TVF011 vs Sharp LD-D121
• Planar TVF011 vs Sharp LD-EC121