Barco XT1.2-E vs Sharp LD-FE123

1.2 mm against 1.2 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 7.93 × 4.46 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density — 619,351 and 623,269 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Barco XT1.2-E is the lighter rig: 36 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 219 kg of difference — 1,433 kg versus 1,652 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Barco XT1.2-E draws more: 655 W/m² against 183 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.2 kW versus 6.4 kW, and 13 versus 3 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 52 data runs for this wall, though they carry 4 and 4 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 609.92 × 343.08 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Barco XT1.2-E — specs and calculator
• Sharp LD-FE123 — specs and calculator
• All Barco panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Sharp LD-FE123 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.2
• Sharp LD-FE123 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.2
• Barco XT1.2 vs Sharp LD-FE123
• Absen CL1.2 V3 vs Sharp LD-FE123
• Barco XT1.2-E vs Sharp LD-D121
• Barco XT1.2-E vs Sharp LD-EC121