Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7 vs Samsung IW008C

0.781 mm against 0.84 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7	Samsung IW008C
Manufacturer	Nanolumens	Samsung
Pixel pitch	0.781 mm	0.84 mm
Cabinet	600 × 337.5 mm	806.4 × 453.6 mm
Brightness	700 nits	600 nits
Refresh rate	not published	7,680 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	170° / 155°
Pixels per cabinet	768 × 432	960 × 540
Pixels per m²	1,638,400	1,417,234
Weight	5.1 kg (25 kg/m²)	11.4 kg (31 kg/m²)
Max power	97 W (479 W/m²)	130 W (355 W/m²)
Typical power	29 W	88 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7	Samsung IW008C
Wall built	13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m	10 × 10, 8.06 × 4.54 m
Panels needed	169 + 9 spare	100 + 5 spare
Resolution	9,984 × 5,616 px	9,600 × 5,400 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,027 kg	1,265 kg
Load per point	~411 kg across 3	~506 kg across 3
Power, full white	16.4 kW	13 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	7	5
Data runs	169 at ≤1/port	100 at ≤1/port
Truck, linear	10.8 m	9.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.06 × 4.54 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7 resolves finer: 1,638,400 pixels per square metre against 1,417,234 for Samsung IW008C, 16% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 9,984 px across versus 9,600 px.
Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7 is the lighter rig: 25 kg/m² against 31 kg/m². Across this wall that is 238 kg of difference, 1,027 kg versus 1,265 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7 draws more: 479 W/m² against 355 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 16.4 kW versus 13 kW, and 7 versus 5 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Samsung IW008C: 100 runs against 169, at 1 and 1 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 806.4 × 453.6 mm, so 169 tiles versus 100 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 9.4 m for Samsung IW008C against 10.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7 vs Samsung IW008C

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons