RigPlan.app

Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6500IP vs Samsung IW008C

0.78125 mm against 0.84 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6500IPSamsung IW008C
ManufacturerPhilips (PPDS)Samsung
Pixel pitch0.78125 mm0.84 mm
Cabinet600 × 337.5 mm806.4 × 453.6 mm
Brightness1,000 nits600 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°170° / 155°
Pixels per cabinet768 × 432960 × 540
Pixels per m²1,638,4001,417,234
Weight5.12 kg (25 kg/m²)11.4 kg (31 kg/m²)
Max power108 W (533 W/m²)130 W (355 W/m²)
Typical power36 W88 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6500IPSamsung IW008C
Wall built13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m10 × 10, 8.06 × 4.54 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare100 + 5 spare
Resolution9,984 × 5,616 px9,600 × 5,400 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,030 kg1,265 kg
Load per point~412 kg across 3~506 kg across 3
Power, full white18.3 kW13 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)75
Data runs169 at ≤1/port100 at ≤1/port
Truck, linear10.8 m9.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.06 × 4.54 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons