RigPlan.app

Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7 vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6500IP

0.781 mm against 0.78125 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6500IP
ManufacturerNanolumensPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch0.781 mm0.78125 mm
Cabinet600 × 337.5 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness700 nits1,000 nits
Refresh ratenot published3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet768 × 432768 × 432
Pixels per m²1,638,4001,638,400
Weight5.1 kg (25 kg/m²)5.12 kg (25 kg/m²)
Max power97 W (479 W/m²)108 W (533 W/m²)
Typical power29 W36 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Nanolumens Engage Pro 0.7Philips (PPDS) 27HDL6500IP
Wall built13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution9,984 × 5,616 px9,984 × 5,616 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,027 kg1,030 kg
Load per point~411 kg across 3~412 kg across 3
Power, full white16.4 kW18.3 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)77
Data runs169 at ≤1/port169 at ≤1/port
Truck, linear10.8 m10.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons