5 matched panels · 3.906 to 3.906 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Nanolumens
ProLights
Panels listed
41
15
Pitch range
0.625 to 10.417 mm
2.604 to 6.667 mm
Cabinet formats
240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm
500×500, 640×720, 500×1000 mm
Weight
25 to 51 kg/m²
23 to 36 kg/m²
Maximum draw
383 to 808 W/m²
480 to 901 W/m²
Brightness
700 to 6,500 nits
650 to 5,500 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 41
15 of 15
Typical draw published
41 of 41
15 of 15
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Nanolumens and ProLights overlap on 5 matched pairs between 3.906 and 3.906 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Nanolumens is the lighter cabinet in 0 of 5 matched pairs, ProLights in 3, and 2 are within 5%. Across their lineups that is 25 to 51 kg/m² against 23 to 36 kg/m².
Nanolumens draws less at full white in 4 of 5 matched pairs, ProLights in 0, and 1 is within 5%. Lineups: 383 to 808 W/m² against 480 to 901 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Nanolumens builds in 240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm; ProLights in 500×500, 640×720, 500×1000 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 41 panels by Nanolumens and for every one of its 15 panels by ProLights; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.