Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9 vs ProLights SigmaPix 39T1X2BF

3.906 mm against 3.906 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (65,536 and 65,536 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• ProLights SigmaPix 39T1X2BF is the lighter rig: 29 kg/m² against 37 kg/m². Across this wall that is 154 kg of difference, 1,368 kg versus 1,522 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• ProLights SigmaPix 39T1X2BF draws more: 840 W/m² against 652 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.5 kW versus 33.6 kW, and 8 versus 15 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 6 data runs for this wall, though they carry 31 and 15 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 500 × 500 mm against 500 × 1000 mm, so 144 tiles versus 80 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9: specs and calculator
• ProLights SigmaPix 39T1X2BF: specs and calculator
• All Nanolumens panels
• All ProLights panels

Related comparisons

• Desay X3.9i vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9
• Desay X3.9 vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9
• Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9 vs SiliconCore Tulip 3.9 Outdoor
• Digital Projection RCS-G 3.9 Large vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9
• Digital Projection RCS-G 3.9 Medium vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9
• Digital Projection RCS-C 3.9 Large vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.9