16 matched panels · 1.538 to 5.714 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Hikvision
ROE Visual
Panels listed
55
19
Pitch range
0.781 to 10 mm
1.56 to 8.9 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 500×1000, 960×960, 1280×960 mm
500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm
Weight
17 to 36 kg/m²
9 to 37 kg/m²
Maximum draw
222 to 752 W/m²
420 to 960 W/m²
Brightness
600 to 6,000 nits
800 to 6,000 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 55
19 of 19
Typical draw published
55 of 55
19 of 19
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Hikvision and ROE Visual overlap on 16 matched pairs between 1.538 and 5.714 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Hikvision is the lighter cabinet in 8 of 16 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 8. Across their lineups that is 17 to 36 kg/m² against 9 to 37 kg/m².
Hikvision draws less at full white in 15 of 16 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 1. Lineups: 222 to 752 W/m² against 420 to 960 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Hikvision builds in 600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 500×1000, 960×960, 1280×960 mm; ROE Visual in 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 55 panels by Hikvision and for every one of its 19 panels by ROE Visual; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.