Hikvision DS-D4015CS-2F vs ROE Visual RB1.5

1.538 mm against 1.56 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Hikvision DS-D4015CS-2F	ROE Visual RB1.5
Manufacturer	Hikvision	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	1.538 mm	1.56 mm
Cabinet	640 × 480 mm	500 × 500 mm
Brightness	600 nits	800 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet	416 × 312	320 × 320
Pixels per m²	422,500	409,600
Weight	6 kg (20 kg/m²)	8.16 kg (33 kg/m²)
Max power	138 W (449 W/m²)	210 W (840 W/m²)
Typical power	46 W	105 W
Max hang	not published	20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Hikvision DS-D4015CS-2F	ROE Visual RB1.5
Wall built	12 × 9, 7.68 × 4.32 m	16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	108 + 6 spare	144 + 8 spare
Resolution	4,992 × 2,808 px	5,120 × 2,880 px
Weight incl. bumpers	798 kg	1,256 kg
Load per point	~319 kg across 3	~502 kg across 3
Power, full white	14.9 kW	30.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	6	16
Data runs	36 at ≤4/port	32 at ≤5/port
Truck, linear	6.3 m	6.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.68 × 4.32 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Hikvision DS-D4015CS-2F resolves finer: 422,500 pixels per square metre against 409,600 for ROE Visual RB1.5, 3% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 4,992 px across versus 5,120 px.
Hikvision DS-D4015CS-2F is the lighter rig: 20 kg/m² against 33 kg/m². Across this wall that is 458 kg of difference, 798 kg versus 1,256 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
ROE Visual RB1.5 draws more: 840 W/m² against 449 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 14.9 kW versus 30.2 kW, and 6 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on ROE Visual RB1.5: 32 runs against 36, at 4 and 5 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 640 × 480 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 108 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 6.3 m for Hikvision DS-D4015CS-2F against 6.5 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Hikvision DS-D4015CS-2F vs ROE Visual RB1.5

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons