10 matched panels · 0.781 to 6.667 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Hikvision
Nanolumens
Panels listed
55
41
Pitch range
0.781 to 10 mm
0.625 to 10.417 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 500×1000, 960×960, 1280×960 mm
240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm
Weight
17 to 36 kg/m²
25 to 51 kg/m²
Maximum draw
222 to 752 W/m²
383 to 808 W/m²
Brightness
600 to 6,000 nits
700 to 6,500 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 55
0 of 41
Typical draw published
55 of 55
41 of 41
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Hikvision and Nanolumens overlap on 10 matched pairs between 0.781 and 6.667 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Hikvision is the lighter cabinet in 10 of 10 matched pairs, Nanolumens in 0. Across their lineups that is 17 to 36 kg/m² against 25 to 51 kg/m².
Hikvision draws less at full white in 5 of 10 matched pairs, Nanolumens in 5. Lineups: 222 to 752 W/m² against 383 to 808 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Hikvision builds in 600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 500×1000, 960×960, 1280×960 mm; Nanolumens in 240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 55 panels by Hikvision and for none of its 41 panels by Nanolumens; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.