Hikvision DS-D4729CF-1AC vs Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9

2.976 mm against 2.976 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

	Hikvision DS-D4729CF-1AC	Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9
Manufacturer	Hikvision	Nanolumens
Pixel pitch	2.976 mm	2.976 mm
Cabinet	500 × 1000 mm	500 × 500 mm
Brightness	4,500 nits	5,000 nits
Refresh rate	7,680 Hz	not published
Viewing angle	160° / 140°	140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet	168 × 336	168 × 168
Pixels per m²	112,896	112,896
Weight	13.34 kg (27 kg/m²)	9.18 kg (37 kg/m²)
Max power	290 W (580 W/m²)	163 W (652 W/m²)
Typical power	97 W	50 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Hikvision DS-D4729CF-1AC	Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9
Wall built	16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m	16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	80 + 4 spare	144 + 8 spare
Resolution	2,688 × 1,680 px	2,688 × 1,512 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,267 kg	1,522 kg
Load per point	~507 kg across 3	~609 kg across 3
Power, full white	23.2 kW	23.5 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	8	8
Data runs	16 at ≤9/port	8 at ≤18/port
Truck, linear	4.6 m	5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (112,896 and 112,896 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Hikvision DS-D4729CF-1AC is the lighter rig: 27 kg/m² against 37 kg/m². Across this wall that is 255 kg of difference, 1,267 kg versus 1,522 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9 draws more: 652 W/m² against 580 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.2 kW versus 23.5 kW, and 8 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9: 8 runs against 16, at 9 and 18 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 500 × 1000 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 80 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 4.6 m for Hikvision DS-D4729CF-1AC against 5.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Hikvision DS-D4729CF-1AC vs Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9

Specifications

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons