3 matched panels · 1.5 to 2 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
AET
Samsung
Panels listed
45
12
Pitch range
0.938 to 4.808 mm
0.84 to 6 mm
Cabinet formats
480×270, 600×337.5, 500×500, 480×540, 500×1000, 960×540 mm
480×540, 480×720, 806.4×453.6, 1209.6×680.4 mm
Weight
21 to 54 kg/m²
21 to 31 kg/m²
Maximum draw
400 to 680 W/m²
321 to 772 W/m²
Brightness
550 to 5,500 nits
500 to 1,200 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 45
0 of 12
Typical draw published
45 of 45
12 of 12
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
AET and Samsung overlap on 3 matched pairs between 1.5 and 2 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
AET is the lighter cabinet in 0 of 3 matched pairs, Samsung in 3. Across their lineups that is 21 to 54 kg/m² against 21 to 31 kg/m².
AET draws less at full white in 3 of 3 matched pairs, Samsung in 0. Lineups: 400 to 680 W/m² against 321 to 772 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: AET builds in 480×270, 600×337.5, 500×500, 480×540, 500×1000, 960×540 mm; Samsung in 480×540, 480×720, 806.4×453.6, 1209.6×680.4 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 45 panels by AET and for none of its 12 panels by Samsung; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.