RigPlan.app

AET KL20AA52 vs Samsung IF020H

2 mm against 2 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

AET KL20AA52Samsung IF020H
ManufacturerAETSamsung
Pixel pitch2 mm2 mm
Cabinet480 × 540 mm480 × 540 mm
Brightness700 nits1,200 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet240 × 270240 × 270
Pixels per m²250,000250,000
Weight7 kg (27 kg/m²)5.8 kg (22 kg/m²)
Max power117 W (451 W/m²)180 W (694 W/m²)
Typical power39 W60 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

AET KL20AA52Samsung IF020H
Wall built16 × 8, 7.68 × 4.32 m16 × 8, 7.68 × 4.32 m
Panels needed128 + 7 spare128 + 7 spare
Resolution3,840 × 2,160 px3,840 × 2,160 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,096 kg942 kg
Load per point~438 kg across 3~377 kg across 3
Power, full white15 kW23 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)68
Data runs16 at ≤8/port16 at ≤8/port
Truck, linear5.4 m5.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.68 × 4.32 m and 7.68 × 4.32 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons