RigPlan.app

AET KL14AA54 vs Samsung IF015H

1.5 mm against 1.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

AET KL14AA54Samsung IF015H
ManufacturerAETSamsung
Pixel pitch1.5 mm1.5 mm
Cabinet480 × 540 mm480 × 540 mm
Brightness700 nits800 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet320 × 360320 × 360
Pixels per m²444,444444,444
Weight7 kg (27 kg/m²)5.8 kg (22 kg/m²)
Max power117 W (451 W/m²)200 W (772 W/m²)
Typical power39 W67 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

AET KL14AA54Samsung IF015H
Wall built16 × 8, 7.68 × 4.32 m16 × 8, 7.68 × 4.32 m
Panels needed128 + 7 spare128 + 7 spare
Resolution5,120 × 2,880 px5,120 × 2,880 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,096 kg942 kg
Load per point~438 kg across 3~377 kg across 3
Power, full white15 kW25.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)616
Data runs32 at ≤4/port32 at ≤4/port
Truck, linear6 m6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.68 × 4.32 m and 7.68 × 4.32 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons