AET KL14AC52 vs Samsung IF015H

1.5 mm against 1.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.16 × 4.59 m and 7.68 × 4.32 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (444,444 and 444,444 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Samsung IF015H is the lighter rig: 22 kg/m² against 26 kg/m². Across this wall that is 256 kg of difference, 942 kg versus 1,198 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Samsung IF015H draws more: 772 W/m² against 448 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 16.8 kW versus 25.6 kW, and 9 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Samsung IF015H: 32 runs against 34, at 9 and 4 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 480 × 270 mm against 480 × 540 mm, so 289 tiles versus 128 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 6 m for Samsung IF015H against 11.9 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• AET KL14AC52: specs and calculator
• Samsung IF015H: specs and calculator
• All AET panels
• All Samsung panels

Related comparisons

• Samsung IF015H vs Sharp LD-FE153
• Samsung IF015H vs Sharp LD-D151
• Samsung IF015H vs Sharp LD-EC151
• Barco XT1.5-E vs Samsung IF015H
• Leyard CLI1.5 vs Samsung IF015H
• Esdlumen (LianTronics) Pilot Pro 1.5 vs Samsung IF015H