RigPlan.app

Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 4.0 vs ROE Visual DM3.9

4 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 4.0ROE Visual DM3.9
ManufacturerBlizzard IRiSROE Visual
Pixel pitch4 mm3.91 mm
Cabinet1200 × 300 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,000 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz1,920 Hz
Viewing anglenot published140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet300 × 75128 × 128
Pixels per m²62,50065,536
Weight10 kg (28 kg/m²)5.76 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power175 W (486 W/m²)150 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power58 W*75 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 4.0ROE Visual DM3.9
Wall built6 × 15, 7.20 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed90 + 5 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution1,800 × 1,125 px2,048 × 1,152 px
Weight incl. bumpers975 kg898 kg
Load per point~390 kg across 3~359 kg across 3
Power, full white15.8 kW21.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)68
Data runs6 at ≤23/port6 at ≤31/port
Truck, linear6.5 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.20 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons