RigPlan.app

INFiLED ARmk2 ORAR3.9mk2 vs ROE Visual Diamond DM3.9

3.91 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

INFiLED ARmk2 ORAR3.9mk2ROE Visual Diamond DM3.9
ManufacturerINFiLEDROE Visual
Pixel pitch3.91 mm3.91 mm
Cabinet500 × 1000 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness5,000 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz1,920 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 155°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet128 × 256128 × 128
Pixels per m²65,53665,536
Weight12.5 kg (25 kg/m²)5.76 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power360 W (720 W/m²)150 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power120 W75 W
Max hang20 panels20 panels

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

INFiLED ARmk2 ORAR3.9mk2ROE Visual Diamond DM3.9
Wall built16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed80 + 4 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,048 × 1,280 px2,048 × 1,152 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,200 kg898 kg
Load per point~480 kg across 3~359 kg across 3
Power, full white28.8 kW21.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)108
Data runs6 at ≤15/port6 at ≤31/port
Truck, linear4.4 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons