RigPlan
Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED ORART3.9 mini vs ROE Visual DM3.9

3.91 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

INFiLED ORART3.9 miniROE Visual DM3.9
ManufacturerINFiLEDROE Visual
Pixel pitch3.91 mm3.91 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Pixels per cabinet128 × 128128 × 128
Pixels per m²65,53665,536
Weight13 kg (52 kg/m²)5.76 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power180 W (720 W/m²)150 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power60 W75 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

INFiLED ORART3.9 miniROE Visual DM3.9
Wall built16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,048 × 1,152 px2,048 × 1,152 px
Weight incl. bumpers2,072 kg1,029 kg
Load per point~829 kg across 3~412 kg across 3
Power, full white25.9 kW21.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)98
Data runs6 at ≤31/port6 at ≤31/port
Truck, linear5.8 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons