Which is lighter, INFiLED IRAR3.9mk2 or ROE Visual DM3.9?

ROE Visual DM3.9 is the lighter rig: 23 kg/m² against 25 kg/m². Across this wall that is 171 kg of difference — 1,029 kg versus 1,200 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.

Which draws more power?

INFiLED IRAR3.9mk2 draws more: 720 W/m² against 600 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 28.8 kW versus 21.6 kW, and 10 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.

Which resolves finer?

Both resolve to about the same density — 65,536 and 65,536 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.

RigPlan

Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED IRAR3.9mk2 vs ROE Visual DM3.9

3.91 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	INFiLED IRAR3.9mk2	ROE Visual DM3.9
Manufacturer	INFiLED	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	3.91 mm	3.91 mm
Cabinet	500 × 1000 mm	500 × 500 mm
Pixels per cabinet	128 × 256	128 × 128
Pixels per m²	65,536	65,536
Weight	12.5 kg (25 kg/m²)	5.76 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power	360 W (720 W/m²)	150 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power	120 W	75 W
Max hang	20 panels	20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	INFiLED IRAR3.9mk2	ROE Visual DM3.9
Wall built	16 × 5 — 8.00 × 5.00 m	16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	80 + 4 spare	144 + 8 spare
Resolution	2,048 × 1,280 px	2,048 × 1,152 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,200 kg	1,029 kg
Load per point	~480 kg across 3	~412 kg across 3
Power, full white	28.8 kW	21.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	10	8
Data runs	6 at ≤15/port	6 at ≤31/port
Truck, linear	4.4 m	5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density — 65,536 and 65,536 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
ROE Visual DM3.9 is the lighter rig: 23 kg/m² against 25 kg/m². Across this wall that is 171 kg of difference — 1,029 kg versus 1,200 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
INFiLED IRAR3.9mk2 draws more: 720 W/m² against 600 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 28.8 kW versus 21.6 kW, and 10 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Both come out at 6 data runs for this wall, though they carry 15 and 31 panels per port respectively.
Different cabinet formats: 500 × 1000 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 80 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 4.4 m for INFiLED IRAR3.9mk2 against 5.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

INFiLED IRAR3.9mk2 vs ROE Visual DM3.9

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons