Which is lighter, INFiLED ORART3.9 mini or ROE Visual GP3.9?

ROE Visual GP3.9 is the lighter rig: 18 kg/m² against 52 kg/m². Across this wall that is 1,152 kg of difference — 920 kg versus 2,072 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.

Which draws more power?

INFiLED ORART3.9 mini draws more: 720 W/m² against 640 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 25.9 kW versus 25.6 kW, and 9 versus 10 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.

Which resolves finer?

Both resolve to about the same density — 65,536 and 65,536 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.

RigPlan

Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED ORART3.9 mini vs ROE Visual GP3.9

3.91 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	INFiLED ORART3.9 mini	ROE Visual GP3.9
Manufacturer	INFiLED	ROE Visual
Pixel pitch	3.91 mm	3.91 mm
Cabinet	500 × 500 mm	500 × 1000 mm
Pixels per cabinet	128 × 128	128 × 256
Pixels per m²	65,536	65,536
Weight	13 kg (52 kg/m²)	9 kg (18 kg/m²)
Max power	180 W (720 W/m²)	320 W (640 W/m²)
Typical power	60 W	160 W
Max hang	not published	12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	INFiLED ORART3.9 mini	ROE Visual GP3.9
Wall built	16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m	16 × 5 — 8.00 × 5.00 m
Panels needed	144 + 8 spare	80 + 4 spare
Resolution	2,048 × 1,152 px	2,048 × 1,280 px
Weight incl. bumpers	2,072 kg	920 kg
Load per point	~829 kg across 3	~368 kg across 3
Power, full white	25.9 kW	25.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	9	10
Data runs	6 at ≤31/port	6 at ≤15/port
Truck, linear	5.8 m	4.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density — 65,536 and 65,536 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
ROE Visual GP3.9 is the lighter rig: 18 kg/m² against 52 kg/m². Across this wall that is 1,152 kg of difference — 920 kg versus 2,072 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
INFiLED ORART3.9 mini draws more: 720 W/m² against 640 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 25.9 kW versus 25.6 kW, and 9 versus 10 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Both come out at 6 data runs for this wall, though they carry 31 and 15 panels per port respectively.
Different cabinet formats: 500 × 500 mm against 500 × 1000 mm, so 144 tiles versus 80 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 4.4 m for ROE Visual GP3.9 against 5.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

INFiLED ORART3.9 mini vs ROE Visual GP3.9

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons