RigPlan.app

Dahua DHI-PHSIA4-SC vs ROE Visual DM3.9

4 mm against 3.91 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Dahua DHI-PHSIA4-SCROE Visual DM3.9
ManufacturerDahuaROE Visual
Pixel pitch4 mm3.91 mm
Cabinet640 × 480 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness600 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz1,920 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet160 × 120128 × 128
Pixels per m²62,50065,536
Weight6.5 kg (21 kg/m²)5.76 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power123 W (400 W/m²)150 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power41 W75 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Dahua DHI-PHSIA4-SCROE Visual DM3.9
Wall built12 × 9, 7.68 × 4.32 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed108 + 6 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution1,920 × 1,080 px2,048 × 1,152 px
Weight incl. bumpers852 kg898 kg
Load per point~341 kg across 3~359 kg across 3
Power, full white13.3 kW21.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)68
Data runs4 at ≤27/port6 at ≤31/port
Truck, linear5.6 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.68 × 4.32 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons