Barco X1.9 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9

1.92 mm against 1.905 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3 — this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density — 270,400 and 275,267 pixels per square metre — so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Weight is close: 37 kg/m² for Barco X1.9 against 36 kg/m² for Unilumin UpanelS 1.9, so the rigging plot looks much the same either way.
• Barco X1.9 draws more: 917 W/m² against 669 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 33 kW versus 23.7 kW, and 20 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Barco X1.9: 20 runs against 26, at 10 and 9 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 400 × 450 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 200 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 7.3 m for Unilumin UpanelS 1.9 against 8.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Barco X1.9 — specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS 1.9 — specs and calculator
• All Barco panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Sharp LD-FE193 vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9
• Planar CLI1.9-F vs Unilumin UpanelS 1.9
• Unilumin UpanelS 1.9 vs YES TECH MG10 P1.9
• Barco X1.9 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 1.9
• Barco X1.9 vs Sharp LD-FE193