AET QC 4.81 (500×1000) vs ProLights DeltaPix 48T

4.808 mm against 4.808 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (43,264 and 43,264 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• ProLights DeltaPix 48T is the lighter rig: 28 kg/m² against 30 kg/m². Across this wall that is 192 kg of difference, 1,208 kg versus 1,400 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• ProLights DeltaPix 48T draws more: 800 W/m² against 680 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 27.2 kW versus 28.8 kW, and 10 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 4 data runs for this wall, though they carry 24 and 48 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 500 × 1000 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 80 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 5.6 m for AET QC 4.81 (500×1000) against 5.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• AET QC 4.81 (500×1000): specs and calculator
• ProLights DeltaPix 48T: specs and calculator
• All AET panels
• All ProLights panels

Related comparisons

• Dahua DHI-PHGIA4.81-SH vs ProLights DeltaPix 48T
• Dahua DHI-PHGOA4.81-PH vs ProLights DeltaPix 48T
• AET QC 4.81 (500×500) vs ProLights DeltaPix 48T
• AET QC 4.81 (500×1000) vs Dahua DHI-PHGIA4.81-SH
• AET QC 4.81 (500×1000) vs Dahua DHI-PHGOA4.81-PH
• AET QC 4.81 Outdoor (500×500) vs ProLights DeltaPix 48T