RigPlan.app

AET QC 4.81 (500×1000) vs Dahua DHI-PHGIA4.81-SH

4.808 mm against 4.808 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

AET QC 4.81 (500×1000)Dahua DHI-PHGIA4.81-SH
ManufacturerAETDahua
Pixel pitch4.808 mm4.808 mm
Cabinet500 × 1000 mm500 × 1000 mm
Brightness800 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°160° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet104 × 208104 × 208
Pixels per m²43,26443,264
Weight15 kg (30 kg/m²)11.45 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power340 W (680 W/m²)210 W (420 W/m²)
Typical power115 W65 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

AET QC 4.81 (500×1000)Dahua DHI-PHGIA4.81-SH
Wall built16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m
Panels needed80 + 4 spare80 + 4 spare
Resolution1,664 × 1,040 px1,664 × 1,040 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,400 kg1,116 kg
Load per point~560 kg across 3~446 kg across 3
Power, full white27.2 kW16.8 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)108
Data runs4 at ≤24/port4 at ≤24/port
Truck, linear5.6 m4.2 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons