RigPlan.app

AET QC 4.81 (500×1000) vs Nanolumens Performance 500 4.8

4.808 mm against 4.808 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

AET QC 4.81 (500×1000)Nanolumens Performance 500 4.8
ManufacturerAETNanolumens
Pixel pitch4.808 mm4.808 mm
Cabinet500 × 1000 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness800 nits5,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hznot published
Viewing angle140° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet104 × 208104 × 104
Pixels per m²43,26443,264
Weight15 kg (30 kg/m²)9.18 kg (37 kg/m²)
Max power340 W (680 W/m²)163 W (652 W/m²)
Typical power115 W50 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

AET QC 4.81 (500×1000)Nanolumens Performance 500 4.8
Wall built16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed80 + 4 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution1,664 × 1,040 px1,664 × 936 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,400 kg1,522 kg
Load per point~560 kg across 3~609 kg across 3
Power, full white27.2 kW23.5 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)108
Data runs4 at ≤24/port4 at ≤48/port
Truck, linear5.6 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons