Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 vs Nanolumens NanoPanel 55

0.78 mm against 0.625 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Absen KLCOB0.7 V2	Nanolumens NanoPanel 55
Manufacturer	Absen	Nanolumens
Pixel pitch	0.78 mm	0.625 mm
Cabinet	600 × 337.5 mm	1200 × 675 mm
Brightness	800 nits	800 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet	768 × 432	1920 × 1080
Pixels per m²	1,638,400	2,560,000
Weight	4.6 kg (23 kg/m²)	22 kg (27 kg/m²)
Max power	91 W (449 W/m²)	310 W (383 W/m²)
Typical power	30 W	150 W
Max hang	15 panels	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Absen KLCOB0.7 V2	Nanolumens NanoPanel 55
Wall built	13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m	7 × 7, 8.40 × 4.72 m
Panels needed	169 + 9 spare	49 + 3 spare
Resolution	9,984 × 5,616 px	13,440 × 7,560 px
Weight incl. bumpers	942 kg	1,168 kg
Load per point	~377 kg across 3	~467 kg across 3
Power, full white	15.4 kW	15.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	7	7
Data runs	169 at ≤1/port	49 at ≤1/port
Truck, linear	10.8 m	7.1 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.40 × 4.72 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Nanolumens NanoPanel 55 resolves finer: 2,560,000 pixels per square metre against 1,638,400 for Absen KLCOB0.7 V2, 56% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 13,440 px across versus 9,984 px.
Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 is the lighter rig: 23 kg/m² against 27 kg/m². Across this wall that is 226 kg of difference, 942 kg versus 1,168 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 draws more: 449 W/m² against 383 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 15.4 kW versus 15.2 kW, and 7 versus 7 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Nanolumens NanoPanel 55: 49 runs against 169, at 1 and 1 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 1200 × 675 mm, so 169 tiles versus 49 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 7.1 m for Nanolumens NanoPanel 55 against 10.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Absen KLCOB0.7 V2 vs Nanolumens NanoPanel 55

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons