SiliconCore Daffodil 2.5 vs Unilumin UpanelS 2.5

2.533 mm against 2.54 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.90 × 4.45 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (155,817 and 154,838 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Unilumin UpanelS 2.5 is the lighter rig: 36 kg/m² against 48 kg/m². Across this wall that is 405 kg of difference, 1,433 kg versus 1,838 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• SiliconCore Daffodil 2.5 draws more: 678 W/m² against 382 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23.8 kW versus 13.5 kW, and 13 versus 7 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 13 data runs for this wall, though they carry 16 and 16 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 608 × 342 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• SiliconCore Daffodil 2.5: specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS 2.5: specs and calculator
• All SiliconCore panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Digital Projection Radiance LED 2.5 vs Unilumin UpanelS 2.5
• Planar TVF025 vs Unilumin UpanelS 2.5
• SiliconCore Daffodil 2.5 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 2.5
• Planar TVF025 vs SiliconCore Daffodil 2.5
• Digital Projection Radiance LED 2.5 vs SiliconCore Daffodil 2.5